<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Nick Bergus - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-0f338e3c" type="application/json"/><link>http://nickbergus.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://nickbergus.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:32:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Metaphors: Burger King and, sigh, the Titanic</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2010/03/metaphors-burger-king-and-sigh-the-titanic/#comment-42108147</link><description>Howard, we gotta keep this cheap, so we're a strict Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V operation here ;) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your point is a good one: "good" journalism isn't always as expensive and hard-to-produce as the Titanic passengers would have us believe. Thanks for offering up the simile.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Bergus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:32:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors: Burger King and, sigh, the Titanic</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2010/03/metaphors-burger-king-and-sigh-the-titanic/#comment-42087754</link><description>well you could at least clean up my typos :) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Some) Journalists are intent on clutching to old models, like a Titanic passenger clinging to ... "&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Reality it is, however, just not true.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Howard Owens</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:53:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors: lawns and, um, genocide?</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/12/metaphors-lawns-and-um-genocide/#comment-36083685</link><description>Fellini
&lt;br&gt;David Rutter's "Quinn, Uncle Fester and the Painter with the Big Hair"
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I often thought the various folks who appeared in public and announced what their boss, Rod Blagojevich, was up to this fine day must have viewed that job as a bit role in a new Fellini movie, replete with clowns, hallucinations captured with cameras tilted at odd angles and many large, angry Italian women with moustaches. They all looked like they wished they could be doing something else at the moment, like being abducted by anal-probing aliens maybe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Rutter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:10:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I want a new Twitter client for Android</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2010/02/i-want-a-new-twitter-client-for-android/#comment-35857701</link><description>A good point. I would prefer a simple client that does a few things really well to one that has a ton of features (especially ones I don't really need) that sorta work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of my biggest complaints is the user interface. &lt;a href="http://Twitter.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Twitter.com&lt;/a&gt;'s sucks, but a Twitter client's doesn't have to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Bergus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:45:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I want a new Twitter client for Android</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2010/02/i-want-a-new-twitter-client-for-android/#comment-35844984</link><description>I have recently experience enough problems with Twidroid to convince me to try a new client (Seismic in this case). I think the problem Twidroid has is similar to the problem Twitter had/has, a focus on creating new features instead of fixing and streamlining the features already implemented.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sbergus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:14:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors: socially useless supervillians and the Titanic, yet again</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/10/metaphors-socially-useless-supervillians-and-the-titanic-yet-again/#comment-21198731</link><description>The Titanic fallacy is interesting, however, it's implication that airplanes made boats obsolete is inaccurate. As a main mode of transoceanic travel perhaps, but we still have major cruiselines, massive transoceanic shipping and plenty of other things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Titanic's sister ship Olympic served throughout WW1 as a troop transport and hospital ship, it is likely that had the Titanic (or the Britannic for that matter) survived their Trans-Atlantic trips, they would have served similar purposes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The plane may have jeopardized the future of the boating industry for passenger transit, but it took quite a while before the passenger airline became an affordable reality.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg Hollingsworth</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:28:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-20958221</link><description>Just remembered one of the best media metaphors ever:
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyr2WwbT4aU&amp;amp;feature=PlayList&amp;amp;p=52F2D45E4CF295F1&amp;amp;playnext=1&amp;amp;playnext_from=PL&amp;amp;index=12" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Buttry</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:09:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My own private URL shortener</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/08/my-own-private-url-shortener/#comment-15742675</link><description>Once I figured out I needed to upgrade to PHP 5, it worked like a dream. Thanks, Phil. Nice work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Bergus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:12:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My own private URL shortener</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/08/my-own-private-url-shortener/#comment-15726503</link><description>Looks like it's working, eh?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Nelson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:03:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iowa newspaper awards make you feel good, don&amp;#8217;t mean much else</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/02/iowa-newspaper-awards-make-you-feel-good/#comment-14522291</link><description>Good points, Gregory. Outside opinions are valuable. Of course it looks good to be able to call your paper an award-winning newspaper; it's good for advertising and readership, I'm sure. My point was that newspapers shouldn't neither do what they do to win awards nor put too much stock in winning them (or, as you suggest, not winning them).
&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Bergus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 15:21:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iowa newspaper awards make you feel good, don&amp;#8217;t mean much else</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/02/iowa-newspaper-awards-make-you-feel-good/#comment-14492070</link><description>Often a reader's, or a community's, perception of a newspaper is different than that of the editor. Consider stories of hot-button issues, or sensitive subjects. People will drop their subscription or re-subscribe over a story. Businesses will pull ads or maintain a contract.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;But when a newspaper submits their work to a contest, then an independent judge -- someone who does not have a stake in a local subject -- can give a more objective assessment. Winning an award tells newspapers that they are maintaining their quality. (Not winning actually does not say much, since you may have had stiffer competition in one category, or not so much in another.)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Winning awards is not the only factor editors should consider, though. If you have strong advertising, then that shows your chosen readership area appeals to business owners. That's good. If you have a strong subscriber base, then readers are interested in your stories, photos and even the ads. That's also good.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Obviously, you can't please everyone. But if you can win awards, keep a strong subscriber base and maintain profitability, then you have the balance necessary for a quality newspaper and a good business.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregorynorfleet</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:11:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where will those dirty, dirty bloggers aggregators stop?</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/07/where-will-those-dirty-dirty-bloggers-aggregators-stop/#comment-12076649</link><description>This is akin to newspapers and the AP complaining about Google appropriating content by indexing it but not taking the step to add a robots.txt file to reject crawlers that index the content.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Bergus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:51:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10693603</link><description>Yet another maritime model: &lt;a href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/06/10/in-defence-of-paywalls/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://onlinejournalismblog.co...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;"When you’re driving a tanker and you see a big rock ahead - do you ask everyone on the ship to rebuild it as an aeroplane? Or do you start steering away in the hope that your part of the tanker will somehow avoid the worst?" 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Buttry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:08:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10678653</link><description>Sage, I don't claim the list to be complete or definitive. Feel free to suggest any links or quotes I'm missing. I sure the list is missing plenty.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Bergus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:40:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10677074</link><description>To be fair, the Pre-Gutenberg Monks metaphor was stolen from Clay Shirky in Here Comes Everybody (or at least, Shirky's use predates the one you list).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sage Ross</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:01:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10676617</link><description>Nick, if you're going to post Carole King, you should add my Carly Simon reference, too:
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/stevebuttry/status/2065582324" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/stevebuttry...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Buttry</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:36:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10518526</link><description>Duh! Forgot my own Tinkerbell metaphor: &lt;a href="http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/seven-reasons-charging-for-content-wont-work/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://stevebuttry.wordpress.c...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Buttry</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:31:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10497812</link><description>You knew @xarker would have a good one: naked emperor: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/YeLDs" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://bit.ly/YeLDs&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Buttry</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:05:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10497224</link><description>Includes bonus golden goose metaphor!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Bergus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:47:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10497210</link><description>I guess a link would have helped, along with the Bush-Marx reference: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/kueYk" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://bit.ly/kueYk&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Buttry</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:46:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10496929</link><description>Polar metaphors in this piece: George W. Bush and Marx.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Buttry</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:38:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10492082</link><description>Thanks for all the suggestions, Steve.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Bergus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:23:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10489965</link><description>Can't believe it's taken this long to get a Jonestown reference: 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yelvington.com/node/546" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.yelvington.com/node...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;From Steve Yelvington: 
&lt;br&gt;"With all the hyperbolic, ill-sourced and often self-serving End of Days coverage of the newspaper industry lately, we shouldn't be surprised to see any number of really bad ideas surfacing -- and I don't just mean paywalls. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I say: Let the bad ideas flow. Sometimes bad ideas spark good ones. Just don't drink the Kool-Aid."
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Buttry</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:15:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10488666</link><description>The mob and Yalta:
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://correspondents.theatlantic.com/james_warren/2009/05/shhhh_newspaper_publishers_are_quietly_holding_a_very_very_important_conclave_today_will_you_soon_be.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://correspondents.theatlan...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;"One hopes it displays the same sense of purpose as, say, troubled world leaders did at Yalta in 1945 or, in a rather less respectable sector of the economy, beleaguered mob bosses did at a legendary Apalachin, New York, confab in 1957."
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Buttry</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:38:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphors related to the state of news</title><link>http://nbergus.com/2009/06/metaphors-related-to-the-state-of-news/#comment-10487211</link><description>Don't forget buggy whips: &lt;a href="http://finance.toolbox.com/blogs/exuberant-accountant/warren-buffett-newspapers-and-buggy-whips-31598" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://finance.toolbox.com/blo...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Buttry</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:04:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
